The Middle East War on Christians

Muslim-majority nations are doing to followers of Jesus what they did to the Jews
by RON PROSOR - The Wall street journal

This week, as Jews celebrate the Passover holiday, they are commemorating the Bible's Exodus story describing a series of plagues inflicted on ancient Egypt that freed the Israelites, allowing them to make their way to the Holy Land.   But over the past century, another exodus, driven by a plague of persecution, has swept across the Middle East and is emptying the region of its Christian population.                

The persecution is especially virulent today.

The Middle East may be the birthplace of three monotheistic religions, but some Arab nations appear bent on making it the burial ground for one of them.   

For 2,000 years, Christian communities dotted the region, enriching the Arab world with literature, culture and commerce.   

At the turn of the 20th century, Christians made up 26% of the Middle East's population.   Today, that figure has dwindled to less than 10%.   Intolerant and extremist governments are driving away the Christian communities that have lived in the Middle East since their faith was born.

In the rubble of Syrian cities like Aleppo and Damascus, Christians who refused to convert to Islam have been kidnapped, shot and beheaded by Islamist opposition fighters.   
In Egypt, mobs of Muslim Brotherhood members burn Coptic Christian churches in the same way they once obliterated Jewish synagogues.   And in Iraq, terrorists deliberately target Christian worshipers.   This past Christmas, 26 people were killed when a bomb ripped through a crowd of worshipers leaving a church in Baghdad's southern Dora neighborhood.

Christians are losing their lives, liberties, businesses and their houses of worship across the Middle East.   It is little wonder that native Christians have sought refuge in neighboring countries—yet in many cases they find themselves equally unwelcome.   Over the past 10 years, nearly two-thirds of Iraq's 1.5 million Christians have been driven from their homes. Many settled in Syria before once again becoming victims of unrelenting persecution.   Syria's Christian population has dropped from 30% in the 1920s to less than 10% today.

In January, a report by the nondenominational Christian nonprofit organization 'Open Doors' documented the 10 most oppressive countries for Christians; nine were Muslim-majority states noted for Islamic extremism, and the 10th was North Korea. 

These tyrannical regimes uphold archaic blasphemy and defamation-of-religion laws under the guise of protecting religious expression.   In truth, these measures amount to systematic repression of non-Islamic groups.

Last year in Saudi Arabia, two men were prosecuted for the "crime" of converting a woman to Christianity and helping her flee the Islamic kingdom.   According to the Saudi Gazette, one of the men, a Lebanese, was sentenced to six years in prison and 300 lashes, and the other man, a Saudi, was sentenced to two years and 200 lashes.   Those are relatively mild sentences in Saudi Arabia, where conversion to another religion is punishable by death.

The "justice system" in other Islamic nations is not particularly just for Arab citizens, but it is uniquely oppressive for Christians.   Radical Islamists in the northern Syrian city of Raqqa are using an ancient law called the "dhimmi pact" to extort local Christians.   The community is faced with a grim choice: pay a tax and submit to a list of religious restrictions or "face the sword."

In the Islamic Republic of Iran, expressions of political dissent are regarded as acts of blasphemy.   Last summer, three Iranian Christians caught selling Bibles were found guilty of "crimes against state security" and sentenced to 10 years in prison.   They were relatively lucky.   The regime has executed dozens of people for the so-called crimes of "waging war against God" and "spreading corruption on Earth."

The scene unfolding in the Middle East is ominously familiar.   At the end of World War II, almost one million Jews lived in Arab lands.   The creation of Israel in 1948 precipitated an invasion of five Arab armies.   When they were unable to annihilate the newborn state militarily, Arab leaders launched a campaign of terror and expulsion that decimated their ancient Jewish communities.   They succeeded in purging 800,000 Jews from their lands.

Today, Israel, which I represent at the United Nations, is the only country in the Middle East with a growing Christian population.   Its Christian community has increased from 34,000 in 1948 to 140,000 today, in large measure because of the freedoms Christians are afforded.

From courtrooms to classrooms and from the chambers of Parliament to chambers of commerce, Israeli Christians are leaders in every field and discipline.   Salim Joubran, a Christian Arab Israeli, has served as a Supreme Court justice since 2003 and Makram Khoury is one of the best-known actors in Israel and the youngest artist to win the Israel Prize, our highest civic honor.

Father Gabriel Nadaf, a Greek Orthodox priest living in Israel, recently told me: "Human rights are not something to be taken for granted.   Christians in much of the Middle East have been slaughtered and persecuted for their faith, but here in Israel they are protected."

Nations that trample on the rights of their people sow the seeds of instability and violence. The uprisings that have erupted across the Middle East are evidence that the region's Holy Grail has become the pursuit of freedom, democracy and equality.   Let us hope that this quest bears fruit before it is too late for the region's remaining Christians.

Mr. Prosor is Israel's ambassador to the United Nations.

Your US Congress At Work...

Just a Reminder...

Obama Birth Certificate: Confirmed Forgery According To Top Experts

From StoryLeak By Michael Thomas

No attempt to even hide the forgery by those who fabricated the fraudulent document

The birth certificate in question is actually a purported copy of Barack Obama’s original birth certificate which is currently held by Hawaii’s Department of Health. This copy was posted in April of 2011 on the official whitehouse.gov website where it still appears today. The following document is an exact copy of what appears on the website.

Just in case the facts contained in the subtitle are not entirely clear, the allegations concerning the fraudulent and forged birth certificate have been re-stated by competent experts as follows. The first excerpt is from an article that was recently published on a major alternative news platform.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive research of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood,” Hagmann said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the basis for the PDF document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama.

Instead, they found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in the affidavit,” wrote Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the ‘signature’ of the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the public affidavit.”[1]

What follows is a second excerpt from the same article quoting a second graphics expert which is equally as compelling.

More recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the report.[1]

These extremely serious and substantive developments in the Cold Case Posse investigation will have extraordinary repercussions for the Obama Administration.  The governmental, political and legal ramifications are so far-reaching that Watergate will pale in comparison.

The relevant filed affidavits give every indication that this nation is about to enter an unprecedented constitutional crisis. Because there are two presidential terms involved, numerous executive orders issued and various treaties signed by this president, a nullified term(s) as president presents various legal and constitutional issues never confronted by the US Federal Government.

Top investigators make serious allegations about what has been officially labeled a forged, fraudulent birth certificate.

Mike Zullo is the lead investigator in the Cold Case Posse investigation initiated by Phoenix Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  Because of recent developments with the case indicating the likelihood of criminal charges, “sheriff’s investigators now are assisting the Cold Case volunteers”.  Zullo has recently issued the following statements:

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine.”

Zullo explained that because it’s an active investigation that could produce criminal charges, he’s unable to reveal details at the moment.

But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth certificate, could be public as early as March.[1]

Zullo goes on the record with the following explosive assertions:

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained.

“One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.[1]

The entire Executive Branch will surely receive a tremendous amount of criticism for the part they played in this conspiracy to deceive the American people. Of course, the hundreds of individuals involved in the vetting process of this president will likewise take on their fair share of culpability in what has to be the “political crime of the millennium”. That would include a significant number of those in leadership throughout the Democratic Party to include both Bill and Hillary Clinton.

It is quite difficult to see how the Democratic Party will emerge from their direct involvement with covering up such a serious forgery.  Years of outright collusion in this highly convoluted and complex crime will certainly call into question the integrity of the entire DNC leadership. The many staff attorneys who participated in the vetting process and, therefore, in the coverup will also be subjected to intense legal and ethics scrutiny.

Why has the leadership of both major political parties failed to proceed with the appropriate congressional investigations in light of so much compelling and irrefutable evidence of numerous crimes having been committed in the filing of the forged birth certificate?

Especially criminal activity so serious and premeditated as filing a completely fake birth certificate which was used as proof of meeting the constitutional requirements of federal election law, as well as the additional statutory requirements of the fifty states.

“24 Attorneys General Investigating Obama’s Birth Certificate“

When faced with substantial allegations of a felony being committed, law enforcement authorities are obligated to see the investigation through to it end.  They are required by law to determine the merits of the case and then make a criminal referral to the appropriate State Attorney.   Apparently that process is exactly what is being played out throughout the nation regarding Obama’s forged birth certificate.

At least half of the State’s Attorneys across the country have been looking very closely at the Obama birth certificate forgery case for many years now.  Each of them knows that their failure to pursue the legal merits, given the conclusive results of an official investigation, exposes them to charges of official misconduct.  Misprision of felony is just one of the many offenses that each of the involved state officials can be charged with.

Phoenix Sheriff Refers Criminal Investigation Of Obama’s Birth Certificate To State Attorneys

Conclusion:

It is inconceivable that the mainstream media (MSM) has not only avoided this story for over five years; it has gone to extremes to cover up the many “high crimes” involved.  Likewise, never in US history has the entire political establishment been AWOL concerning a matter of such national significance and legal import.  By neglecting to properly investigate these crimes, the nation is now faced with the prospect of a full blown constitutional crisis of epic proportions.

YES … it is that serious and much more!

“Totally unparalleled and unprecedented, with nary a whit of historical precedent” is the way that one commentator described the unfolding constitutional crisis.

Michael Thomas
December 15, 2013

Author’s Note:
The Israel Science and Technology website performed exhaustive analyses and technical assessments on the posted copy of the Long-Form Birth Certificate. Here are the final and categorical conclusions which they published on their web page entitled:

Long-Form Birth Certificate of Obama is a Forged Document

“The analyses presented below reveal without a doubt that the Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama is a fabricated, fake and forged document.

The publication of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reins on the most powerful country of the World.

Moreover, the lack of action on the part of the members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate, as well as the courts of the United States, despite many previous appeals to these three branches of American government, also raise a concern about how the governmental institutions of the reputedly best, and certainly the most important democracy in the Free World have avoided this issue.”

Read more: http://www.storyleak.com/obama-birth-certificate-confirmed-forgery-according-top-experts/#ixzz2wi1LsHNz

Krauthammer’s Take: Obama Is Being ‘Ridiculed by Russians’

Krauthammer’s Take: 
Obama Is Being ‘Ridiculed by Russians’



President Obama has thus far responded tepidly to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, targeting only several individuals in Russia for sanctions and providing Ukraine with rations as opposed to the arms it requested. 

Because of Obama’s rhetoric and policy, Charles Krauthammer said the president is being “ridiculed by Russians.”

“If he thinks that sanctioning seven Russians out of a population of, what, 150 million is a sanction, he’s living in a different world,” Krauthammer said. 

Instead we should be sending Ukraine weapons, something the administration denied because it thinks “somehow to arm the victim of aggression is a provocation,” Krauthammer explained.

The idea that such small, targeted sanctions will work is “preposterous,” Krauthammer said. “This really is a humiliating response by a president who can’t even get the Europeans to join him in effective sanctions.”

“America's Biggest National-Security Problem Is Barack Obama.”

“America's Biggest National-Security Problem Is Barack Obama.” 
From The National Review    By Eliana Johnson   March 6, 2014 11:02 AM

With the Obama administration grappling with a crisis in Ukraine, former United Nations ambassador John Bolton took the stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday and declared that the country’s “biggest national-security problem is Barack Obama.” 

Bolton honed in on the terror attack in Benghazi, Libya, which he described as paradigm of President Obama’s foreign-policy failures because the president “has done nothing to avenge Chris Stevens’s death.” 

“That is a terrible lesson for our adversaries,” Bolton said. “Under Barack Obama you can murder his personal representative and get away scot-free.” 

He also warned that the matter will come back to haunt Hillary Clinton if, as most suspect, she launches a presidential bid in 2016. “We will be happy to tell Hillary Clinton in unmistakable terms, ‘We know what difference it makes, even if you don’t,’” he said.

Bolton, who has established a political-action committee to support hawkish House and Senate candidates, bristled at the reluctance of Republican politicians in recent years to back foreign interventions and characterized the shift as a “resurgence of isolationism.”

“Ignoring our national security is the Obama doctrine,” he told the crowd. 

Our 'Irreplacable", Fearless, Always Honest, Commander-In-Chief

Uhhh... What did you say...?

 

"I Have A Pen...!!!  I don't need Congress!

 

I bow to your holiness, the leader of all Muslims...

 

Please make sure I'm doing it the Muslim way...

 Any questions...!

 

The REAL 'One'...

On the prayer rug... With another Muslim...

"POT is the same as drinking alcohol..."

 

Is there a better description...? 

No explanation needed...

 

Family Picture...

More Disrespect for America!  The Crotch salute...

 ________________

And... Of course, our last resort...

 

Mrs. Clinton, The Truth About Benghazi Does Make A Difference...

Mrs. Clinton, The Truth About Benghazi Does Make A Difference... 
By Michael Ingmire - FOXNEWS  

President Obama nominated Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State and she was confirmed by the Senate in January 2009.   A tenure lasting less than four years that would affect the lives of four American families forever. 

While traveling the globe during her time in office as Secretary of State, Clinton was vocal in her support for the empowerment of women in countries throughout the world.   But were there any major foreign policy initiatives led by Secretary Clinton during her time in office? 
Unfortunately, no. 

Was Secretary Clinton hoping to create a substantial legacy with the establishment of a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya? 
Without a doubt, success in Benghazi would also help support the 2012 campaign narrative coming from the Obama White House claiming that Al Qaeda was "on the run.” 

With J. Christopher Stevens at the helm, Secretary Clinton’s appointee, a fully operational diplomatic outpost in Benghazi would show that democracy could succeed in post-Qaddafi Libya. 

Could this be a version of ‘Peace in the Middle East’ as negotiated by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton?   Perhaps she may have even been able to tout this achievement during future campaign rhetoric in 2016. 

Secretary Clinton ignored the warnings and object lessons that were present from the 2012 terrorist attacks on the Red Cross, the assassination attempt on the British Ambassador to Libya and the attacks that occurred at the American Diplomatic Outpost in Benghazi, all before September 11, 2012. 

Most importantly, she refused the Ambassador’s repeated requests for additional security at the diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya. 

When coupled with her inability to answer the proverbial "3 a.m. phone call" during the terrorist attack on the diplomatic outpost, Secretary Clinton’s lack of competency was brought to light. 
It is amazing how wrong one person can be. 

In January 2013, during her testimony on Capitol Hill concerning Benghazi, Secretary of State Clinton famously stated to Senator Ron Johnson, when testifying about the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods, and my nephew Sean Smith, “...what difference does it make?” 

How wrong can one person be? 

I can assure Mrs. Clinton that the contributing and determining circumstances make a huge difference to the families of these four brave Americans and to a substantial percentage of the American public. 

It made a difference to my nephew Sean Smith as he called his mother, Pat Smith, on September 11, 2012.   We can only imagine the fear that Sean was experiencing in his service to his country; expressing his fears, he stated there were “suspicious men taking pictures of the compound where he was staying.” 

The January 15, 2014 release of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi confirms what hundreds of hours of research, inquiry, and conversation revealed to me and many other Americans the following: 
 

1. The September 11, 2012 attack could have been prevented.

2. Secretary of State Clinton did not do an appropriate risk assessment for Ambassador Stevens and other outpost personnel.

3. Al Qaeda was directly involved in the detailed planing and execution of the attack.

4. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton both knew it was a terrorist attack on the evening of September 11, 2012.

5. A lie was manufactured and perpetuated as they repeatedly blamed an anti-Islamic video as the impetus of the attack.

I must conclude that the Obama administration has, and will continue to stonewall, lie, and belittle any attempt to establish any real efforts to achieve accountability for the September 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi.

Consideration of the truth versus a calculated deception is of upmost importance when seeking the office of Presidency of the United States of America.   Whether it is was during the Presidential election of 2012 or the upcoming campaign of 2016; deception and apathy, concerning the deaths of four Americans due to a terrorist attack, do not have an expiration date.

With the recent findings of the Senate Intelligence Committee Report of Benghazi, I wonder if House Speaker John Boehner and the Obama administration still find the claims made by the family members of these four murdered Americans to be false. 

Reacting to a scathing letter sent on January 6, 2014 to House Speaker John Boehner, an anonymous aide to senior GOP leadership called our claims "absurd and inaccurate." 
Really? 

I will continue to seek the truth and demand full accountability regarding the terrorist attack on September 11, 2012 in Benghazi, Libya. 
IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

Michael Ingmire is a musician, writer, and activist based in North Carolina. He is the uncle of Sean Smith, one of the four Americans killed during the attacks in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.

This Is Why Black People Living In America Are Thought of As Un-American and Cruel

This is why Black People living in America are thought of as Un-American and nasty, evil, and almost 'not human' people. They are disrespectful and cruel, and hove NO regard for ANYONE other than themselves.  

They call themselves African-Americans... Are they African?  Or are they American?  They need to choose or we will exterminate them when the revolution begins...
They live in their own feeble little minds... 
LINK TO STORY

 

MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!

Phillip Manning on Obama...

The truth at last...
______________________________

WE'RE IN A LOT OF TROUBLE !!!

Obama's Ex-Bodyguard:  Scandal's 'Worse Than You Know' !!!
By Max Slavo
November 6, 2013
- You may have your suspicions about what’s going on behind closed doors at the White House...




But according to one of President Obama’s former body guards it’s much worse than we can even imagine.

Dan Bongino has protected numerous Presidents over his career, including President Obama.   He has been within ear-shot of many a discussion in the Oval Office, but up until this administration has stayed out of the lime light.   Apparently, however, the activities of this administration are so abhorrent that he could no longer keep quiet.

Bongino is so upset with what he witnessed that he is now running for Congress because he feels it’s the only way to take America back from the sycophants who have made every effort to enrich themselves with money and power at the expense of the American people.

How bad is it?

"We’re in a lot of trouble.
The President sees government – and I think it’s because of his lack of experience and maybe community organizing in the past – as this shiny new toy.

For all the disagreements I had with Clinton, Carter and Bush there were always limits… there was that line you just didn’t cross… We cross it seemingly every day. We’re lost in the scandals…
The Jamie Dimon shakedown at Chase… the HHS scandal.. Kathleen Sebelius shaking down the health care industry for money… the IRS… it’s to the point where these scandals in and of themselves would be huge back-breaking scandals [but] are just lost in the scandal fog of this administration…
It’s worse than people know… and I’m not trying to scare you either."

This is coming from someone who has stood next to Presidents for his entire career.
The implications are absolutely terrifying, especially considering how bad the publicly known scandals already are.   Can you imagine what’s happening outside the view of Americans?

This is not about Republican or Democrat, it’s about liberty, pure and simple, and this administration has done more to damage our individual rights than any that has come before it.

Bongino expresses this succinctly when discussing the NSA scandal and the administration’s use of the information acquired by government snoops all over the country.

"You give the government information and it will be abused.  It is not a matter of if it’ll be abused, it’s only a matter of when…

When the line between the personal self and the public self… when that line is determined by the government that keeps your information in a trove for release any time they need it, how are you free?
...the bottom line is, having worked inside the government, it will be abused. It is only a matter of time.

We are all doing something wrong.   The catch is not “if” we’re doing something wrong.  It is “are your private wrongs impacting on my civil liberties?”

If not, the government has no business in your life…  it’s a red herring…
If you’re not doing something wrong?   The question is only whether your private wrongs that have no effect on anyone else become exposed for the government’s benefit.

…It’s only a matter of time before someone slaps an email on your desk from fifteen years ago…  and says ‘look what we got against you.’
Remember, when the key is held by someone else, liberty means absolutely nothing. That personal and private self are being evaporated."

Make no mistake. 
They - and that especially includes this administration and/or agents acting under their directives and initiatives - will use everything they can against you when it suits them.

The prerogative has always been to destroy anything or anyone who threatens the establishment.   We’ve seen it time and again with this, as well as past, White House administrations and Congressional membership.

Now, more than ever before, they will start targeting those who speak out against them and jeopardize their agenda.
____________________________

I guess we all now know... It's gonna get WORSE before it get's BETTER!
Stand strong AMERICANS!  
The thieves, they are among us!

Adelson: US should drop atomic bomb on Iran

Adelson: US should drop an atomic bomb on Iran

By MAYA SHWAYDER JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT   10/24/2013 14:58

American-Jewish billionaire blasts Obama over negotiations with Tehran; says US should show Iran nuclear capabilities.  

 

 

NEW YORK – 

During a panel at Yeshiva University on Tuesday evening, Sheldon Adelson, noted businessman and owner of the newspaper Israel Hayom, suggested that the US should use nuclear weapons on Iran to impose its demands from a position of strength.

Asked by moderator Rabbi Shmuley Boteach whether the US should negotiate with Iran if it were to cease its uranium enrichment program, Adelson retorted, “What are we going to negotiate about?”

Adelson then imagined what might happen if an American official were to call up an Iranian official, say “watch this,”  and subsequently drop a nuclear bomb in the middle of the Iranian desert.

"Then you say, ‘See!    The next one is in the middle of Tehran.   So, we mean business.   You want to be wiped out?   Go ahead and take a tough position and continue with your nuclear development.   You want to be peaceful?   Just reverse it all, and we will guarantee you that you can have a nuclear power plant for electricity purposes, energy purposes’," Adelson said.

“So a tremendous demonstration of American strength?”  Boteach clarified.  “So that they would get the message?”

“It’s the only thing they understand,”  Adelson said.

“And do you see the current negotiations as a sign of weakness?”  Boteach asked.

“Absolutely,”  Adelson said.

Adelson, who donated tens of millions of dollars to defeated Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney during the most recent campaign, criticized the Obama administration's willingness to engage the Iranians diplomatically.

"[It's] the worst negotiating tactic I could ever imagine, my entire life," he said.

"Because you can’t get anything.   He’s not saying to them, Roll back your entire program and show that you’re willing to be peaceful.   So, roll it all back… and we’ll roll back the sanctions….   What is that, a game of chicken, who’s going to blink first?"

In response to Adelson's comments, Boteach said whether the remarks were regarded as serious or an exaggeration to exemplify the extreme measures that the U.S. must take to thwart Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, the international community often employs double standards on Israeli issues.

“When I heard Sheldon make his remark, my initial thought was that his purpose was to goad his more liberal critics into attacking the policy so that their double standards on nuclear threats against Israel could be exposed,”  said Rabbi Boteach in a statement.

“I would hope that those who seem alarmed by Sheldon’s overstatement on the extent to which the United States should go to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon will at least protest that much more loudly against its actual development,”  he added.
 

Islam A Religeon of Peace? Are You Kiddin' Me...?

I'm a Christian.  
I do not worship Jesus, The Christ, I worship GOD.

I was raised to believe that religion was the worship of GOD, and NOT the worship of a man.

These Mulsims worship their prophet Mohammed, who they believe is in the same group of other prophets such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, and Jesus.  All of whom were very peaceful believers of their faith.
 
So I'm having a little difficulty with this Islam propaganda that says they are the 'religion of peace' when I put their ideas up against the facts.  

I don't see any other world religion behaving so violently, by killing people or terrorizing people.  And I don't hear any other world religion saying that they will 'rule the world'.

That kind of activity doesn't mix very well with ANY peaceful intentions or Godly behavior that I have EVER heard about or witnessed.  

Frankly I believe these Muslims are a bunch of frauds.  They're not a religion at all... They are a group of gangsters, and criminals, and frankly a group of terrorist intimidating the worlds population.

Their goal is to scare folks, intimidate folks, and threaten folks to join them... or be killed.  
REAL Religions DO NOT behave in such a manner.

Watch this video from CBN of how Muslims have nearly taken over Belgium, and listen to their rationale...



So what do you think?  The religion of peace...? 
I believe they are mere violent gangsters.  
Hitler would be proud of their behavior.

This is what the 'religion of peace' does to Christians who refuse to 'convert' to their beliefs...

Soon, there will be fighting in the streets of the United States of America... NOT because we disagree with their behavior or their beliefs... 
No, it will be to save our way of life.  
DO YOU WANT TO BECOME ONE OF THEM?
The time to decide is NOW!

NEVER Trust ANY Muslim!

Non-Muslims Targeted In Deadly Attack On Nairobi Mall, Witness Says...
From The Associated Press

Nairobi, Kenya - Gunmen threw grenades and opened fire Saturday killing at least 22 people in an attack targeting non-Muslims at an upscale mall in Kenya's capital that was hosting a children's day event, a Red Cross official and witnesses said.
 
The attackers remained inside and firing subsided as military surrounded the mall hours after the attack. People continued to trickle out from hiding places within the Westgate mall, which is frequented by expatriates and rich Kenyans in Nairobi's affluent Westlands neighborhood.
 
Kenya Red Cross official Abbas Gullet said at least 22 people were killed in the attack that police blamed on terrorists. He said the death toll would likely rise.
 
"We are treating this as a terrorist attack," said police chief Benson Kibue, adding that there are likely no more than 10 attackers involved.
 
Police did not say what group was responsible for the attack.
 
Somali's rebel group al-Shabab vowed in late 2011 to carry out a large-scale attack in Nairobi in retaliation for Kenya's sending of troops into Somalia to fight the Islamic insurgents.
 
Off duty Sgt. Major Frank Mugungu said Saturday he saw four male attackers and one female, and that he could clearly identify one of the gunmen as a Somali, though he could not identify the rest.
 
The Westgate mall, with shops like Nike, Adidas and Bose, has Israeli ownership, and security personnel have in the past identified the mall as a likely terror target in the city.
 
Elijah Kamau, who was at the mall at the time of the midday attack, said that the gunmen made a declaration that non-Muslims would be targeted.
 
"The gunmen told Muslims to stand up and leave. They were safe, and non-Muslims would be targeted," he said.
 
Jay Patel, who sought cover on an upper floor in the mall when shooting began, said that when he looked out of a window onto the upper parking deck of the mall he saw the gunmen with a group of people.
 
Patel said that as the attackers were talking, some of the people stood up and left and the others were shot.
 
The gunmen carried AK-47s and wore vests with hand grenades on them, said Manish Turohit, 18, who hid in a parking garage for two hours.
 
"They just came in and threw a grenade. We were running and they opened fire. They were shouting and firing," he said after being marched out of the mall in line with about 15 people who held their hands in the air.
 
Rob Vandijk, who works at the Dutch embassy, said he was eating at a restaurant inside the mall when attackers lobbed hand grenades inside the building. He said gunfire then burst out and people screamed as they dropped to the ground.
 
It appears the attack began at the outdoor seating area of Artcaffe at the front of the mall, witnesses said.
 
Patrick Kuria, an employee at Artcaffe, said:  "We started by hearing gunshots downstairs and outside.  Later we heard them come inside.  We took cover.   Then we saw two gunmen wearing black turbans.  I saw them shoot."
 
Some people were shot at the entrance to the mall after volleys of gunfire moved outside and a standoff with police began.

Ambulances continued to stream in and out of the mall area, ferrying the wounded who gradually emerged from hiding inside the mall.
 
People clutched their small children, and some cried.  At one point in the day mall guards used shopping carts to wheel out wounded children.

A local hospital was overwhelmed with the number of wounded being brought in hours after the attack, so they had to divert them to a second facility.
_______________________
 
Need any more proof?  Muslims are out to take over the ENTIRE world! 
And you thought Hitler was a monster... 
As I said above...
NEVER TRUST ANY MUSLIM ! ! !

Obama’s 1st Term: Real Median Income Down $2,627; People in Poverty Up 6,667,000

Census on Obama’s 1st Term: Real Median Income Down $2,627; People in Poverty Up 6,667,000; Record 46,496,000 Now Poor 

From CNS News   By Terrence P. Jeffery

(CNSNews.com) - 
During the four years that marked President Barack Obama’s first term in office, the real median income of American households dropped by $2,627 and the number of people in poverty increased by approximately 6,667,000, according to data released today by the Census Bureau.

The record total of approximately 46,496,000 people in the United States who are now in poverty, according to the Census Bureau, is more than twice the population of Syria, which, according to the CIA, has 22,457,336 people.

In 2008, the year Obama was elected, real median household income in the United States was $53,644 according to the Census Bureau. 
In 2012, the last full year of Obama’s first term, median household income was $51,017. Thus, real median household income dropped $2,627—or 4.89 percent—from 2008 to 2012.

In fact, real median household income dropped in every year of Obama's first term. 
In 2008, when he was elected, it was $53,644. In 2009, the year he was inaugurated, it dropped to 53,285.  In 2010, his second year in office, it dropped to $51,892. In 2011, his third year in office, it dropped to $51,100. And, in 2012, his fourth year in office, it dropped to $51,017.

At the same time the number of people living in poverty in the United States increased. In 2008, according to the Census Bureau, there were approximately 39,829,000 people living in poverty in this country. In 2012, there were 46,496,000.  That is an increase of approximately 6,667,000—of 16.73 percent—from 2008 to 2012.

The number of people in poverty increased during three of the four years of Obama's first term--taking a slight dip from 2010 to 2011, but then rising again from 2011 to 2012. 
In 2008, there were 39,829 people in poverty in the U.S. In 2009, it climbed to 43,569. In 2010, it climbed again to 46,343.  In 2011, it dipped to 46,247. And, in 2012, it climbed to an all-time high 46,496.

In 2008, the year Obama was elected, people in poverty represented 13.2 percent of the national population.  In 2012, they represented 15.0 percent of the population.
The income threshold at which a person was determined to be in “poverty,” according to the Census Bureau, depended on the size of their household. 

If a person lived by themselves and earned less than $11,270 in 2012, they were considered to be in poverty.  A family of two people was considered in poverty if they earned less than $14,937.  The threshold for a family of three was $18,284, for a family of four it was $23,492, and for a family of five it was $27,827.

The data reported here on real median household income and the number of people in poverty come from the Census Bureau’s report “Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012,” which was released today.
______________________

Feel better now...?

(CNSNews.com) - During the four years that marked President Barack Obama’s first term in office, the real median income of American households dropped by $2,627 and the number of people in poverty increased by approximately 6,667,000, according to data released today by the Census Bureau.
The record total of approximately 46,496,000 people in the United States who are now in poverty, according to the Census Bureau, is more than twice the population of Syria, which, according to the CIA, has 22,457,336 people.
- See more at: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/census-obama-s-1st-term-real-median-income-down-2627-people-poverty#sthash.hS3zGvpP.dpuf

Best Speech of 2012? Maybe So... Listen...