Obama Is Not An American!!! - Obama Is A Fraud!!! - Obama Is A Muslim!!!
Obama Is A COMMUNIST!

Obama Is An Embarrassment To The Presidency, and To AMERICA!



Scroll Down And Check Out The Links List On The Lower Right Side of The Page





Sunday, December 30, 2012

Gun Laws Are For Little People












Laws Are For Little People
- Not David Gregory
By Mark Stein
A week ago on NBC’s Meet the Press, David Gregory brandished on screen a high-capacity magazine. 

To most media experts, a “high-capacity magazine” means an ad-stuffed double issue of Vanity Fair with the triple-page perfume-scented pullouts. 
But apparently in America’s gun-nut gun culture of gun-crazed gun kooks, it’s something else entirely, and it was this latter kind that Mr. Gregory produced in order to taunt Wayne LaPierre of the NRA. As the poster child for America’s gun-crazed gun-kook gun culture, Mr. LaPierre would probably have been more scared by the host waving around a headily perfumed Vanity Fair

But that was merely NBC’s first miscalculation. It seems a high-capacity magazine is illegal in the District of Columbia, and the flagrant breach of D.C. gun laws is now under investigation by the police.

This is, declared NYU professor Jay Rosen, “the dumbest media story of 2012.” Why? Because, as CNN’s Howard Kurtz breezily put it, everybody knows David Gregory wasn’t “planning to commit any crimes.”

So what? 

Neither are the overwhelming majority of his fellow high-capacity-magazine-owning Americans. Yet they’re expected to know, as they drive around visiting friends and family over Christmas, the various and contradictory gun laws in different jurisdictions. Ignorantia juris non excusat is one of the oldest concepts in civilized society: Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Back when there was a modest and proportionate number of laws, that was just about doable. But in today’s America there are laws against everything, and any one of us at any time is unknowingly in breach of dozens of them. 

And in this case NBC were informed by the D.C. police that it would be illegal to show the thing on TV, and they went ahead and did it anyway: You’ll never take me alive, copper! You’ll have to pry my high-capacity magazine from my cold dead fingers! When the D.C. SWAT team, the FBI, and the ATF take out NBC News and the whole building goes up in one almighty fireball, David Gregory will be the crazed loon up on the roof like Jimmy Cagney in White Heat: “Made it, Ma! Top of the world!” At last, some actual must-see TV on that lousy network.


More HERE...

Who Am I?


Can You Guess Who I Am?

Saturday, December 29, 2012

'White People Aren’t Afraid of Blacks, They’re ‘Afraid of Moron, Idiot Liberals Like Michael Moore’


Fox News Host:  White People Aren’t Afraid of Blacks, They’re ‘Afraid of Moron, Idiot Liberals Like Michael Moore’
By Jason Howerton


On Friday, the hosts of Fox News’ “The Five” blasted liberal filmmaker and provocateur Michael Moore for suggesting that white gun owners are motivated by racial fears when buying firearms.

Even the left-leaning Juan Williams found Moore’s comments “unnecessary.” He said adding race into the conversation for no reason distracts from the “reality” that gun control was first implemented as a way to stop blacks from owning guns.

But co-host Eric Bolling went off.

“Michael Moore is wrong. 
White people who own guns aren’t afraid of freckle-faced Jimmy down the block, and white people who own guns aren’t afraid of black people breaking in or holding them up,” he said. “White people are afraid of moron, idiot liberals like Michael Moore who think they will get their guns taken away because they have a liberal Democrat in office… S0 [white people] go out and they buy guns and make sure they have guns before these idiots have their way.”

Watch the segment via Fox News/Mediaite below:

__________________

Yes, I buy guns out of fear... As Mr. Bolling said... - Fear that one day our liberal congress and this goofy imposter of a President will outlaw the ownership of guns altogether.  And if that ever happens, they will need to "pry my weapon from my cold, dead hands!"

The 2nd Amendment GUARANTEES THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, PERIOD!
And it's NOT OUT OF ANY FEAR OF BLACK PEOPLE!  

I don't know where this bloated idiot Moore came from, but he needs to loose 200 pounds and get a life!  Who ever gave him a platform for this kind of hate speech should be ashamed of themselves... But, what else should we expect from our communist government run media?

Monday, December 24, 2012

Christmas At The Mall? Why Not? Enjoy...

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,
 that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, 
 but have everlasting life."   John 3:16 




Friday, December 21, 2012

Debunked: Gun Control Laws Reduce Crime

John Stossel Exposes The Myth: That Gun Control Laws Reduce Crime
From: IJReview - Kyle Becker

John Stossel explores in the course of two different segments — one on Fox Business and one on ABC News — why gun control laws are not only futile, but passing concealed carry laws does not reduce crime rates.

Gee... I wonder where Mr. John has been all these years?  It's taken him all this time to finally 'wake up'?  Well, at least he's awake NOW.

Here's a quote for ya...:

The Bill of Rights says nothing about hunting. 
The Second Amendment is NOT about hunting!
It's about the possible need for a militia,  which has since been affirmed as an individual right by the Supreme Court, particularly since anyone might be - In these dark times - To once again, be called upon to stand up for Liberty and the survival of the nation.

Criminals will always find a way to obtain a firearm... Remember, THEY"RE CROOKS!

MORE GUNS IN THE HANDS OF LAW ABIDING CITIZENS MAKE US ALL SAFER!   PERIOD!!!

Monday, December 10, 2012

The Chinese Are Buying America

By Laura Prabucki - FOX News
As the U.S. housing market slowly starts to recover, foreign investment is helping it along.

According to the National Association of Realtors, non-American buyers accounted for $82 billion in home sales last year. More than $7 billion of that is by the Chinese, who are now the second largest foreign home purchasers after Canadians. They're buying high-end, multimillion-dollar homes from California to New York and paying cash.

"They're probably the top 1 percent of the Mandarin speakers that are coming from China," said Brent Chang, a Coldwell Banker realtor in Southern California. "They're really the people who have their own businesses or maybe were part of the government."

Some of these homes are specifically catered to Chinese buyers.  

Fox News visited a home listed at $8 million in Pasadena, Calif., that had two kitchens, the smaller one had ventilation for the cooking for aromatic or "stinky" foods like fish.   It also has a lower level in-law suite and even a koi pond.

"People from China do a lot more business in their homes so they want their homes to really scream that they've made it and they're successful, " said Chang.

The Chinese like the U.S. because their money goes further. In Shanghai, $2 million might only get you a two-bedroom condo.

"You get a huge bang for your buck, you get land, you get good schools, you get a safe environment, nice community life, " said Linda Chang, a realtor who works with her son, Brent, in the San Marino and Pasadena areas of California.

Chang says while many other real estate markets have suffered, her area has flourished thanks to Chinese and other foreign buyers.

"It's been fantastic for the U.S. housing market because we have not suffered as other communities have," said the elder Chang. "In fact, our property values have increased."

While some of the Chinese buyers live in the U.S. full or part-time, realtors estimate about 40 percent of the homes are for investments. They're snapping up houses in states hit hard by foreclosures such as Nevada and Florida. Some are buying two or three homes at a time.

According to Shanghai magazine Hurun Report, mainland China has almost 1 million millionaires and nearly half of them say they want to invest in the United States.

"It's a sign of their status," said Betty Chan, who deals with Chinese buyers in Las Vegas. "You can show off to your friends and family that I can buy something overseas, not everybody can do it."

Chan continued: "Most Chinese like to own a Mercedes ... it doesn't matter whether a Mercedes is a good car or not. It's just showing their status in the community, so owning a foreign house is pretty much a prestigious status in China, so they're proud to tell their friends: 'Hey, I own a house overseas.'"

Buyers from China also invested almost $2 billion in commercial property in 2011, or quadruple what they spent several years ago.
____________________________________

So, it looks as if the 'Housing Recovery' is being fueled by the Chinese... NOT by Americans buying and selling property.
Sort of a 'false' indicator, in my humble opinion!


Friday, November 30, 2012

Republicans Should "Walk Away"

Krauthammer's Take: Geithner Deal 'Insulting,' GOP Should Walk Away



Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Yep... It Was All Bush's Fault

Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Dems of financial and housing crisis; meltdown...

Friday, November 23, 2012

CBN Covers the March in Paris Against Islam

Stay Safe Out There...

Have you not known?
Have you not heard?
The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. 
HE does not faint or grow weary;  his understanding is unsearchable.  HE gives power to the faint, and to him who has no might he increases strength.  Even youths shall faint and be weary,and young men shall fall exhausted;  but they who wait for the LORD shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings like eagles;  they shall run and not be weary;  they shall walk and not faint.

Isaiah 40:28-31

_______________________

Saturday, November 17, 2012

AMERICA VOTES - TWICE!














From Mark Alexander at PATRIOT POST
Patriots,
I am writing you today for two reasons.
First, I have heard from many Patriots who remain very disheartened about the election and direction of our country. I have also heard from many who appreciated the words of encouragement in Thursday's column, "We're Back in the FIGHT!," and have forwarded those to family and friends. That message is reprinted below so please forward them to others who need encouragement.

Second, I wanted to send you the most current county-by-county election map, which clearly reveals what state election maps don't, and what Obama and his Leftist cadres do NOT want you to contemplate. It shows where Leftist constituencies reside. (By the way, we have taken the Liberty to correct the colors -- red is a much more fitting color for the Leftist strongholds.)  

The assault on Liberty we witnessed Tuesday, as was the case in 2008, was led primarily by those on urban "ObamaNation Plantations," those who depend on what Obama calls "redistributive justice" from the rest of us in order to survive. They account for almost 60 (SIXTY) percent of Obama's constituents, and Socialist Democrats are masters of co-opting (read: "buying") their allegiance and getting them to the polls. The good news is that about 10 million fewer Obama voters showed up in 2012, despite his billion-dollar campaign.  

Words of Encouragement
Patriots, we were dealt an awful body blow on Tuesday, and the odds we face in our quest to restore Liberty and Rule of Law enshrined in our Declaration and Constitution may seem insurmountable. However, we can find strength and encouragement in the words from the most noble of Founding Patriots, George Washington.

In 1777, at a very dark moment amid a string of defeats in the first quest for Liberty -- and just before the fall of Philadelphia and the brutal Winter at Valley Forge, Washington wrote one of his generals: "We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times."

I also recall the words of Thomas Paine from his Revolutionary pamphlet, The American Crisis: "These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman." When Samuel Adams signed the Declaration, he said, "We have this day restored the Sovereign to whom all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in heaven and from the rising to the setting of the sun, let His kingdom come."

Indeed, God is Sovereign in the affairs of men.

As for the challenges we face, faithful Patriots, hold fast to this wisdom from James 1:2-4: "Consider it pure joy, my brothers and sisters, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith produces perseverance. Let perseverance finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything."

(Some among our Patriot ranks are not Christians, but we know your devotion to Liberty is strong. However, everyone on your Patriot Post team here is a devoted Christian, and the bottom line -- you can bank on our faith, even if you don't share it.)

Patriots, we have lost a battle -- but not the war. Hold your head high and redouble your courage and resolve. Remain steadfast in your devotion to Liberty and hold the line. As Paine wrote, "Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. ... I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave by reflection. 'Tis the business of little minds to shrink, but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death."

It has taken generations for our nation to get into the ditch we are in now. It will take more than a few election cycles to pull it out. But there has been a great awakening among Patriots, and our ranks have grown rapidly in recent years.

Our fight for the eternal cause of Liberty, as "endowed by our Creator," ends only with our last breath.

On behalf of your Patriot Post Team, God bless our great nation and God bless each of you among our Patriot ranks!

Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis
Mark Alexander
_______________________    
We're still in this fight folks!  Don't let this get you down!

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Am I A Racist?














Am I a racist?  
I wonder how many folks have asked that question of themselves?

I bring this up now, at election time, because just last week, someone accused me of being a racist, because I said that I didn't like the way most Black people behaved.  Well, I don’t like it.  That’s a fact.

It’s like they have their own language, and are consciously trying to be very different from other Americans, especially White folks.  Now, at election time, there are reports that if 'the one' isn't re-elected, some Black folks are threatening to cause a national riot!  It seems that many Blacks don't like White folks at all!  
I guess one could argue that this group of Black people - (those who hate Whites), are the real ‘racists’?

I really don’t think I’m a racist.  And I really don’t think I’m a bigot. 
I just don’t like folks that are hurting America.  And I believe that many Black people hate America and are trying to hurt her. 

I also believe that the Muslim people want to hurt America.  They can say they’re for peace, but their history says otherwise.  
A while back, they protested a Christian minister for giving a breakfast prayer at West Point.  
And they have just attacked American Sovereign Soil in Benghazi and killed 4 Americans! 
I just don’t trust any of them and I feel they will try to do us more harm at any time.  Likely they have plans in the works right now!

I’m against anybody that hates America… or has a lifestyle that is harmful to America’s future.   Patriotism is important to me… Morals are important too…

Black, White, Jew, Muslim, Russian, Chinese, African, Eskimo, Japanese… it really doesn’t matter where your grandparents came from or what you look like.
It’s about how you behave and whether you respect American values or not.

If you are demeaning to America, if you are trying to ‘change’ America, if you believe that America has given you the freedom to do as you wish and to go against GOD’s Laws, if you are trying to hurt America in any way, then I’m against you… and you are my enemy.   I will fight you until my last breath for America!

Does that make me a racist?  Does that make me a bigot?  I don’t think so… But I’ll let you be the judge.  If you can show me that you’re qualified to judge me...?
Let's start with that.
Just what DO you believe in that makes you want to hurt America?  That's right, why do you want to hurt America?  If you hate her - and me - so much, why don't you just go back to where your ancestors came from?  Sounds simple to me...

But, if you'd rather stay and fight, I'm ready... COME AND GET SOME!  



Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Obama Facts!

Things To Know Before You Vote!



From Minuteman PAC

Monday, October 22, 2012

Detective Probes Obama SSN Mystery - Files Suit in Ohio...

From July 2012:   Detective Probes Obama SSN Mystery - Files Suit in Ohio!

 

Friday, October 19, 2012

American Presidents Bow Down To NO ONE!


Unfortunately the current inhabitant of The White House Is A Muslim and doesn't respect America's values.
It's time to take out the trash...

Sunday, October 14, 2012

The Muslim In The White House Continues To Lie...

CBS' Lara Logan Slams Obama Admin For Pushing "Major Lie" That Taliban Is Weakened

This is worth the time to watch...




Saturday, October 13, 2012

Islam Is A Trojan Horse!


As The Title Says... This Is The Most Important Video I Have Ever Seen On Islam. 

Sunday, September 30, 2012

The Religion Of Peace...

Muslim protesters torch Buddhist temples, homes in Bangladesh
From: COX'S BAZAR, Bangladesh (Reuters)













Hundreds of Muslims in Bangladesh burned at least four Buddhist temples and 15 homes of Buddhists on Sunday after complaining that a Buddhist man had insulted Islam, police and residents said.

Members of the Buddhist minority in the Cox's Bazar area in the southeast of the country said unidentified people were bent on upsetting peaceful relations between Muslims and Buddhists.

Muslims took to the streets in the area late on Saturday to protest against what they said was a photograph posted on Facebook that insulted Islam.

The protesters said the picture had been posted by a Buddhist and they marched to Buddhist villages and set fire to temples and houses.

Police said they had deployed extra security forces and banned gatherings in Buddhist-dominated areas.   "We brought the situation under control before dawn and imposed restrictions on public gatherings," said Salim Mohammad Jahangir, Cox's Bazar district police superintendent.

Many people in predominantly Muslim Bangladesh have been angered in recent days by a film made in California that mocks the Prophet Mohammad.   Muslims in Bangladesh and beyond have also been outraged by violence over the border in Myanmar where members of the majority Buddhist community clashed with minority Muslims this year.

Police had escorted the man accused of posting the insulting photograph and his mother to safety, Jahangir said.

Sohel Sarwar Kajal, the Muslim head of the council in the area where the arson took place, said he was trying to restore communal peace "We are doing everything possible to quell tension and restore peace between the communities," he told reporters _____________________________________

These are the people our President is bowing to...
He's one of them...
My advice...? 
NEVER TRUST ANY MUSLIM!!!

Monday, September 24, 2012

The Star Spangled Banner!

Have you ever heard a Hard Rock band play like this before?
All I can say is... WOW!

Monday, September 17, 2012

Libya: We gave US three-day warning of Benghazi attack


From:  The Independent - By Kim Sengupta

American diplomats were warned of possible violent unrest in Benghazi three days before the killings of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three members of his team, Libyan security officials say.

The claim came as the country's interim President, Mohammed el-Megarif, said his government had information that the attack on the US consulate had been planned by an Islamist group with links to al-Qa'ida and with foreigners taking part.

However, the American ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, insisted that the killings had resulted from a demonstration against a film about the Prophet Mohamed, replicating protests in Cairo, which had been "hijacked" and got out of control.

The Independent has reported diplomatic sources who said that the threat of an attack against US interests in the region was known to the US administration 48 hours before it took place. The alert was issued by the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, but not made public. A State Department spokesman maintained: "We are not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the US Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent."

But President Megarif told the American station National Public Radio: "We firmly believe that this was a pre-calculated, pre-planned attack that was carried out specifically to attack the US Consulate. A few of those who joined in were foreigners who had entered Libya from different directions, some of them definitely from Mali and Algeria."

A senior official of the biggest militia in Benghazi, the February 17th Brigade, told CNN that he had warned US diplomats of a rapidly deteriorating security situation in Benghazi three days before the attack. "The situation is frightening, it scares us," he said he had stressed during the meeting. Mr Stevens had been back in Libya for only a short time before US security officials decided it would be safe to make the journey to Benghazi during the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks. 

The British consulate in the city was shut after an ambush of a convoy carrying Dominic Asquith, the UK ambassador, in which his bodyguard were injured. The UN and International Committee of the Red Cross offices had been bombed and there had been a spate of political assassinations.

However, Ms Rice denied the Benghazi attack was pre-planned. She said: "Our current best assessment... is that... it was a spontaneous – not a premeditated – response to what had transpired in Cairo. "A small number of people came to the consulate. It seems to have been hijacked by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons... And it then evolved from there." Mr Stevens was separated from his protection team during the attack. He was found, it is thought unconscious, by locals who took him to hospital where, doctors said, he died from smoke inhalation.

The Americans who escaped from the consulate made their way to a "safe house" at a supposedly secret location. That, too, came under mortar fire. Captain Fathi al-Obeidi, who had taken an eight-strong American rescue team which had arrived from Tripoli to the safe house, said "I don't know how they found the place to carry out the attack. 

It was planned, the accuracy with which the mortars hit us was too good for any ordinary revolutionaries." On Sunday, the head of Libya's national congress said about 50 people had been arrested in connection with the attack on the US consulate, though the interior ministry put the figure far lower.
____________________

So... everyone is lying but the folks in The White House?

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Al-Qaeda says attack on U.S. consulate in Libya ‘revenge’ for death of its 2nd man


Attack on U.S. Libyan Consulate ‘revenge’ for death of its 2nd man

From:  alarabiya

Al-Qaeda said the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya was in revenge for the killing of the network’s number two Sheikh Abu Yahya al-Libi, SITE Intelligence Group reported Saturday, as Libyan authorities have identified 50 people who were involved in the attack.

“The killing of Sheikh Abu Yahya only increased the enthusiasm and determination of the sons of (Libyan independence hero) Omar al-Mokhtar to take revenge upon those who attack our Prophet,” al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula said in a statement, quoted by the U.S.-based monitoring group, according to AFP.

Al-Qaeda’s Yemen-based offshoot did not claim direct responsibility for Tuesday’s attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, and three other Americans.

But it stressed that “the uprising of our people in Libya, Egypt and Yemen against America and its embassies is a sign to notify the United States that its war is not directed against groups and organizations ... but against the Islamic nation that has rebelled against injustice.”

The statement comes four days after al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri issued a video eulogizing Libi, his late deputy and propaganda chief who was killed in a drone strike in June.

Mohammed al-Megaryef, the head of Libya’s national assembly, said on Saturday that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi was planned and “meticulously executed.”

Tuesday’s attack by armed men in the eastern city of Benghazi came amid a wave of protests in the Muslim world against a U.S.-made amateur Internet film deemed insulting to the Prophet Mohammed.

Suspected Islamic militants fired on the consulate with rocket-propelled grenades and set it ablaze on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks on the United States claimed by al-Qaeda.

Meanwhile, Libyan authorities have identified 50 people who were involved in the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, a security official said on Saturday, Reuters reported.

So far four people have been arrested and are being questioned, Libyan officials have said.

“We know of 50 people who were involved in the attack, we have names and we know who they are, but there could be more,” Abdul-Moniem al-Hurr, spokesman for Libya’s Supreme Security Committee, said.

“Four have been arrested. Some of the others may have escaped via Benghazi airport, maybe to Egypt, but this not confirmed. We have given their names to all of the Libyan border entry points.”

A spokesman for President Barack Obama said on Friday officials had no evidence the attack was pre-planned, an assertion which has added to confusion over the incident.

Immediately after the attack, U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, were quoted widely in the media saying they believed the attack was well-planned and organized.
________________________________

So... It looks as if the 'Empty Chair' is still lying...


Saturday, September 15, 2012

Hillary Made Decision Not to Post Marines at Benghazi


Colonel: Hillary Made Decision Not to Post Marines at Benghazi

From Breitbart.com - By Michael Patrick Leahy

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, Fox News military analyst Colonel David Hunt laid the blame for the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans at the Benghazi, Libya American mission on Hillary Clinton and the State Department:

The State Department just allowed our guys to get killed. If you approve no bullets in guns for the mission security guards and an outhouse for a mission, you’re inviting it.
Earlier, on Howie Carr's radio show Thursday, Colonel Hunt said that the American mission at Benghazi "was like a cardboard building, there wasn't even bullet proof glass." In addition, Hunt said the security guards inside the mission didn't have bullets:
Howie Carr: They weren't allowed to have bullets, is that correct? 
Colonel Hunt:  That's true.  They were private security.  The rules of engagement were ridiculous. 
Hunt told Breitbart News that the new State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, approved and signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton since the 2011 fall of Khadafi's regime, severely compromised the safety and security of murdered Ambassador Stevens and all American diplomatic staff in Libya. 

He also stated that the decision not to staff Benghazi with Marines was made by Secretary of State Clinton when she attached her signature to the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya document.   Breitbart News has subsequently learned that under those rules of engagement, Secretary Clinton prohibited Marines from providing security at any American diplomatic installation in Libya.

Hunt told Breitbart News that, "the rules of engagement have been changing drastically over the last 10 years. . . The reason the surge in Iraq worked was we had another 40,000 soldiers and the rules of engagement were changed to allow our guys to shoot.  

What’s happened in Libya is the final straw of political correctness. We allowed a contractor to hire local nationals as security guards, but said they can't have bullets. This was all part of the point of not having a high profile in Libya."

According to Hunt, the debacle at the American mission in Benghazi is directly the result of Obama's new policies. "The policy of the Obama administration led to this," he said.

"It was the policy of the Obama administration to have a low profile in Libya. That's why the rules of engagement were approved by the Secretary of State to have no Marines at Benghazi, and to have an American contractor hire Libyan nationals to provide security there. The rules were they couldn't have ammunition."

"Obama may not have known the details of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, but his Chief of Staff and National Security Advisor would have. The Secretary of State absolutely would have."

"The Department of State Security are the people in charge of diplomatic security. They enforce the rules of engagement, which are set at Clinton’s level at State. The Department of Defense was told we’re not going to have Marines at Benghazi. Whether it goes higher than the Secretary of  State to the President, I don't know."

Hunt added that the rules of engagement specific to each country or military situation are drawn up by State Department lawyers and approved by the chain of command.   "There should be a document with Hillary’s signature and the Secretary of Defense's specific to Libya.   It was signed after Khadafi fell from power.  You'll have to ask the State Department to get the document.   They might claim it's classified, but it shouldn't be."

"The State Department has rules of engagement documents that are different for different countries. In our embassies in London and Paris, for instance,  it’s always  a mystery if the Marines at the embassies have ammunition in their weapons."
Hunt compared the security at the Benghazi mission with security at the recent RNC and DNC.

"The recent political conventions had more security than Ambassador Stevens had in Benghazi.   If you carried a sharp stick within a mile of the conventions at Tampa or Charlotte you got arrested, yet you don't give bullets to the guards of our Ambassador to Libya.   It wouldn't surprise me if Al-Qaeda bought off some of the Libyan nationals hired to guard our ambassador at Benghazi."

Ambassador Stevens was based at the American embassy in Tripoli. According to a spokesperson at the State Department, he would visit the mission at Benghazi sporadically. No one at the State Department has yet answered this key question: 
Why on the anniversary of 9-11 was he at the low security mission in Benghazi when it would obviously have been more prudent for him to have been at the presumably more secure embassy in Tripoli?
At her daily press briefing on Thursday, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland offered a description of the defenses at the Benghazi mission that appeared to be in conflict with other press reports. In contrast to some reports that said security within the perimeter of the mission was provided by Libyan nationals, Nuland stated that they provided security on the perimeter and that "there was a robust American security presence inside the compound." [emphasis added]:
QUESTION: Can you talk a little bit more about the security that was at the Embassy?   It seems that for an area such as Benghazi, where there was a lot of instability, there were very few guards there. And can you talk about whether the U.S. asked Libya, the Libyan Government, earlier in the week for extra security precaution and whether that – extra security precautions or security personnel and whether that request was fulfilled. . .It does seem though that there were very few security personnel at this location. 
MS. NULAND: I’m going to reject that, Elise.   Let me tell you what I can about the security at our mission in Benghazi.   It did include a local Libyan guard force around the outer perimeter.   This is the way we work in all of our missions all around the world, that the outer perimeter is the responsibility of the host government.   There was obviously a physical perimeter barrier, a wall.   And then there was a robust American security presence inside the compound.   This is absolutely consistent with what we have done at a number of missions similar to Benghazi around the world. . .
Ms. Nuland, however, failed to elaborate on the specifics or size of the "robust American security" within the perimeter of the mission. Later in her news briefing, she addressed the State Department reasoning for failing to have Marines stationed at Benghazi:

MS. NULAND: There were not marines at this mission.

QUESTION: Why not?

MS. NULAND: They – we have a number of posts around the world.   We have – there are embassies without marines, there are other consulates of this type without marines.   We make a decision based on the local conditions as to whether that makes sense, but this posture that we had, which was external security by the Libyans and then a strong U.S. security presence – but it didn’t include that particular contingent of Americans – inside, in a number of other missions that look a lot like Benghazi. . . 
QUESTION: Is that for marines coming generally from the mission itself, or does the State Department say, you know, the situation’s really bad right now in this particular section of the world, perhaps we should have marines based here. 

MS. NULAND: It’s not a matter of marines necessarily being a qualitatively different way of securing. There are many other ways to secure that are equivalent, too. It depends on the circumstances and it is different in every part of the world, and we evaluate it along with our friends at the Defense Department and other agencies individually, per mission.

Breitbart News has attempted to secure a copy of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, but officials at the State Department have stonewalled, as this email correspondence from Friday reveals:
To [State Dept Spokesperson]:
(A) Status of my document request for the State Department rules of engagement for Libya?
(B) Can you help me find answers to these two questions:
1. Who provided security inside the Benghazi mission at the time of the 9-11-12 attack, how were they armed, and how many of them were there?
2. Who provided security on the perimeter of the Benghazi mission at the time of the 9-11-12 attack, how were they armed, and how many of them were there?

Michael Patrick Leahy - Breitbart News Contributor
Here is the official response from that State Department spokesperson: 

Michael, I do not yet have more information on the rules of engagement document, which as discussed last night, might require a FOIA request. I will let you know as soon as I receive feedback. However, and this also applies to your two follow up questions, we do not discuss security details for the safety of our missions. The two questions below are addressed to the fullest extent possible in both briefings I sent you last night. 

[State Department Spokesperson]  

On Friday, Breitbart News filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the State Department to secure a copy of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.

Look for the State Department to continue to stonewall this request, and resist release of the document until after the election. Its contents will be just too damaging. In effect, the country will be able to see Hillary Clinton's signature on the document that served as Ambassador Chris Stevens's death warrant.
___________________

Stay tuned...



Wednesday, September 12, 2012

American Ambassador, 3 others killed in Libya during riots over Mohammed film


American Ambassador 'Suffocated To Death'...
From: The New York Post 

 TRIPOLI, Libya — The American ambassador to Libya and three other Americans were killed when a mob of protesters and gunmen overwhelmed the US Consulate in Benghazi, setting fire to it in outrage over a film that ridicules Islam's Prophet Muhammad. Libya's new president apologized Wednesday for the attack, which underlined the lawlessness plaguing a region trying to recover from months of upheaval. 

Ambassador Chris Stevens, 52, died as he and a group of embassy employees went to the consulate to try to evacuate staff as a crowd of hundreds attacked the consulate Tuesday evening, many of them firing machine-guns and rocket-propelled grenades...  (more)














So... Are we offending anybody yet?

It's time for a little total, all-out, nuclear war!

These terrorists need to be brought to their knees!  NOW!

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Muslim Mob Attacks U.S. Embassy In Cairo

Cairo protesters scale U.S. Embassy wall, remove flag
From:  USA Today













Egyptian demonstrators climbed the walls of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo today and pulled down the American flag to protest a film they say is insulting to the prophet Mohammad.

Update at 2:07 p.m. ET: CNN reports that U.S. security guards fired a volley of warning shots as the crowd gathered outside the embassy walls.
CNN adds that the embassy had been expecting a demonstration and cleared all diplomatic personnel earlier from the facility.

Original post: The Associated Press reports that embassy officials say there was no staff inside at the time. 












Reuters reports that protesters tried to raise a black flag carrying the slogan: "There is no god but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger."
The news agency says about 2,000 protesters have gathered outside the embassy and about 20 have scaled the walls.

The AP says the protesters were largely ultra-conservative Islamists.
Iran's FARS news agency says the film is the work of a group of "extremist" members of the Egyptian Coptic Church in the United States.

Al Ahram online says the film is reportedly being produced by U.S.-based Coptic-Christian Egyptians, including Esmat Zaklama and Morees Sadek, with the support of the Terry Jones Church in the United States.

Jones is the evangelical pastor who stirred controversy last year by threatening to burn a Quran in public.

CNN says the film in question is a Dutch production.
The AP says clips of the film available on YouTube show the prophet having sex and question his role as the messenger of Godâ??s words.
After the protest, the U.S. Embassy issued this statement on its website:
"The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims â?? as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.   Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy.   Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy.   We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of other(s)."
The Grand Mufti of Egypt Sheikh Ali Gomaa strongly condemned the movie, AllAfrica.com reports.
"Freedom of speech does not warrant desecrating sanctities," Gomaa said in a statement Sunday.
_________________

So... I guess Hussein Obama will not respond?
Guess he doesn't want to 'offend' anyone...

Friday, August 31, 2012

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Obama’s Self-Disarmament of America Continues

Defense & National Security... From - Human Events

Lt. Col. Oliver North


WASHINGTON — Americans following this year’s presidential campaign would never know it from mainstream media coverage, but the commander in chief we hired four years ago has set the United States on a course for unilateral disarmament.

The following people hope you won’t notice until after Nov. 6: Vladimir Putin, Liang Guanglie, Kim Jong-un, Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, Sayyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Salman bin Abdulaziz al-Saud, A.Q. Khan and of course, Barack Obama.



The 10 individuals above share a common fascination: nuclear weapons. - Vladimir Putin, Russia’s modern czar; Liang Guanglie, minister of national defense for the People’s Republic of China; Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s “Great Successor;” and Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Kayani, already have such weapons of mass destruction in their hands, the means of delivering them and are racing to build more. Messer’s Khamenei — Iran’s supreme leader; Gen. al-Sisi, Egypt’s new defense minister; Turkey’s Prime Minister Erdogan; Saudi Crown Prince Salman and Pakistan’s “nuclear physicist for hire” A.Q. Khan — are all aspirants to the exclusive nuclear weapons club — and engaged in various stages of building many more such devices. 
As for Barack Obama — he just wants to get rid of all nuclear weapons — starting with ours.

To many Americans, that sounds a lot like an invitation to disaster. To Global Zero, an international movement dedicated to the elimination of all nuclear weapons, that sounds like a great idea. Barack Obama says, “Global Zero will always have a partner in me and my administration.” And he’s not just talking the talk; he’s walking the walk.


This is the president who showed us how to “lead from behind” on the “responsibility to protect” Libyan civilians from the depredations of a tinhorn despot such as Moammar Gadhafi. But when it comes to exposing American citizens to the horrific threat of being incinerated by incoming nuclear weapons — he’s out in front.


It all started with a Nobel Peace Prize and the infamous Russian “reset button.”  In September 2009, in a blatant effort to show how committed he is to nuclear nonproliferation, Obama abruptly cancelled plans to deploy ballistic missile defense systems in Poland and the Czech Republic.  A month later, the Nobel Committee in Oslo, Norway, voted to give him the 2009 Peace Prize.  It all went downhill from there.


To show the world that he was worthy of the honor, our Nobel laureate rushed into negotiations with Russia on a new strategic arms reduction treaty.  Obama and Russia’s then-president Dmitry Medvedev closed the deal on April 8, 2010 — cutting the U.S. nuclear arsenal in half — from roughly 3,000 to less than 1,700 warheads.  Then, on Dec. 22, in haste to adjourn for Christmas recess, and despite warnings from patriots such as South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint, the Senate recklessly ratified the treaty. By Feb. 2, 2011, when the president inked the New START Treaty — that’s what he calls it — the treaty’s pro-Moscow bias was evident.  

To avoid embarrassing questions about damage to our national security, Obama banned the press from the Oval Office signing ceremony.

Unfortunately, the one-sided U.S.-Russia START agreement is just the tip of the iceberg. 

In arguing for senate ratification of START, Obama promised to immediately begin modernizing the remaining inventory of U.S. nuclear weapons and taking steps to preserve our nuclear triad: land-based ICBMs, strategic bombers and ballistic missile submarines.  He lied.

The warhead modernization program is all but defunct.  Most of our geriatric ICBMs are over 40 years old; our submarine-launched ballistic missiles are a quarter-century old; and some of the aircraft designated to respond to a nuclear attack on the U.S., with weapons in kind, are twice as old as the 30-year-old pilots flying them.  The rest of the world — Russia included — is rushing to design and build modern equivalents for all these systems.  The O-Team isn’t.


Degrading the U.S. offensive nuclear capability and its deterrent factor is bad enough, but the Obama administration’s unilateral disarmament plan goes even further — by eliminating defensive systems to protect our homeland and the American people.  They have already killed three promising airborne and space-based missile defense programs and drastically reduced the number of U.S.-based interceptors.


When I was at the Naval Academy, I was a boxer.  What Obama has done is tantamount to sending a boxer into the ring against seven opponents, with his hands shackled around his waist.  He can’t throw a punch.  He can’t even put up his hands to defend himself.


Worse, we don’t know what else is secretly “on the table” in this effort to gut America’s defenses.  Reporters covering the presidential campaign ask about every conceivable issue but pose no questions about what Obama meant last March when he was overheard begging Medvedev to ask Putin for more “space” until after the election, when he would have “more flexibility.”  Since then, the O-Team has shrugged off Russian bombers inadvertently penetrating U.S. airspace and a Russian sub trolling around in the Gulf of Mexico.


Arizona Congressman Trent Franks, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, described Obama administration plans to make further cuts in our nuclear deterrence as “reckless lunacy.”  


So, too, is rehiring a commander in chief hellbent on unilateral disarmament.


Bedbugs and Islam

Friday, August 17, 2012

Social Security Administration Explains Plan to Buy 174,000 Hollow-Point Bullets


(CNSNews.com - By Penny Starr) – Aug 16, 2012 

 The Social Security Administration posted a blog on Thursday to explain why it was planning to purchase 174,000 hollow point bullets. SSA posted a "Request for Quote for Ammunition" on the FedBizOps.gov website on Aug. 7. 

The request listed the commodity that SSA desired as ".357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition." The quantity listed was "174 TH." 

The SSA’s Office of the Inspector General’s said it posted a new blog on the agency’s website, “Beyond the Numbers,” “as we strive to be a transparent and accountable government organization for all of our stakeholders. 

“With those goals in mind, we thought it would be appropriate to address recent media reports regarding the organization’s purchase of ammunition for our special agents’ duty weapons,” the blog post states. The blog states that the SSA has 295 special agents who work in 66 offices across the United States. 

 “These investigators have full law enforcement authority, including executing search warrants and making arrests,” the blog post states. “Our investigators are similar to your State or local police officers. 

 “They use traditional investigative techniques, and they are armed when on official duty,” the blog post states. Concern expressed in some media reports about the type of ammunition ordered by the agency is unfounded, the blog states, explaining that the .357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacked hollow point pistol ammunition is “standard issue for many law enforcement agencies” and is appropriate for the work agents perform. 

 “Our special agents need to be armed and trained appropriately,” the blog post states. “They not only investigate allegations of Social Security fraud, but they also are called to respond to threats against Social Security offices, employees, and customers.” 

 The blog also links to another post about a fight that broke out near an SSA office in Massachusetts that required action by law enforcement officials. “SSA is processing more applications than ever, which means more traffic in SSA office,” the blog states. “Employee and visitor safety is the highest priority for OIG, which, together with the Federal Protective Services and local law enforcement, has jurisdiction over SSA workplaces.” 

 Prior to the blog being posted, CNSNews.com had asked the agency specific questions about its ammunition order. Although some of those questions were addressed by the information provided in the blog, the agency did not say why it needed 174,000 bullets and if that quantity was customary or had increased from previous orders.
 ___________ 

First comment on the web site: 
 BY:  edinflorida • 8 hours ago 

 "I have been in law enforcement for 37 years. I have worked with federal agents for years. 
The Drug Enforcement Administration Agents (DEA), US ICE Agents, FBI Agents, and etc. Each of these agencies has always purchased their own ammo. 

So, why now is it necessary for agencies that really have no law enforcement responsibilities, like Social Security, Department of Agriculture, DHS, TSA and etc. buying such vast quantities of ammo? 

The reasons given here by the Social Security Administration for buying ammo are ridiculous. These reasons given alone causes me grave concern because the reasons are lame at best. So, why the ammo purchases? This is worrying the hell out of me because I fear these purchases are cynical in nature. 

I believe the persons responsible for these purchases are really from the Obama Administration. Remember when Obama was elected he stated that he wanted a civilian army just as well equipped and well trained as the US Military. 

Just know that this is what Hitler did when he armed his Brown Shirts. The Brown Shirts were used to terrorize and intimidate German Citizens who spoke out against Hitler. These agencies are buying much more ammo than is customarily purchased by our established federal law enforcement agencies. 
Don’t ignore this because something sinister is taking place."
_______________

Sounds like Ed knows what he's talking about...
Why is the government buying so many bullets all of a sudden?
My advice to you folks?  
Stay alert, and BUY MORE AMMO!